Again, the conversation to focus on is in the background - Again, here’s the original raw video and my attempt at transcription, the important part is at 06:28 point: [ “#2″ is the male eye witness ]
@6:28/6:29 of video
#1 How’d he get from there to there?
#2 Because he ran, the police was still in the truck – cause he was like over the truck
#2 But him and the police was both in the truck, then he ran – the police got out and ran after him
#2 Then the next thing I know he coming back toward him cus - the police had his gun drawn already on him –
#1. Oh, the police got his gun
#2 The police kept dumpin on him, and I’m thinking the police kept missing – he like – be like – but he kept coming toward him
#2 Police fired shots – the next thing I know – the police was missing
#1 The Police?
#2 The Police shot him
#2 The next thing I know … I’m thinking … the dude started running … (garbled something about “he took it from him”)
Additionally, this eye witness account clarifies other issues and disputes the “shot in back narrative”. The police vehicle was positioned “screen view left” – Mike Brown’s body is positioned head toward police vehicle. This would also corroborate both the Officer (as told to his friend) and this witness account of what transpired.
If anyone can clean up that audio, I’m sure the police investigators would a.) like to hear it, and b.) like to talk to the man who is explaining what he saw firsthand on the street.
I’m fairly dubious that this will get much play. The MSM will likely try to ignore it for two reasons: First, it doesn’t fit the narrative the MSM is pushing; Second, the not invented here syndrome: This came from a blogger not of the MSM fraternity, and so cannot possibly be news. Good heavens, the blogger may not even have a J-School degree, and so is totally unqualified to recognize news in the first place, let alone report it.
NONE In The Back: Brown Autopsy Shows He Was Shot In The Front Of The Body