Is Cooked Data Better Than No Data? Sure, If You’ve Got An Agenda to Push
Bill Quick

Divorce and Social Science | Power Line

It’s already happened to two researchers who attempted to assemble and analyze statistics on adopted children raised by gay couples, Mark Regnerus, a sociologist at the University of Texas at Austin, and Loren Marks, a sociologist at Louisiana State University.  In separate studies using standard panel large-scale survey methodology, they each concluded that children raised in same-sex marriage households had higher rates of various social dysfunctions than children raised in traditional married households.  As with almost every social science analysis, there is ample room to criticize the research design, and Regnerus’s sample size (only about 250 parents) may be too small and over too short a span to bear the weight of any conclusions at this point.

How about a comparison to straight single parent households?

That wouldn’t demonize gay households sufficiently?  In fact, it might even make them look good?

Well, never mind, then.  Just take those bogus “children of gay marriage” studies to the bank.  I guess when Hayward talks about “following the data,” he doesn’t give a rat’s ass how badly cooked that data actually is.

Bill Quick

About Bill Quick

I am a small-l libertarian. My primary concern is to increase individual liberty as much as possible in the face of statist efforts to restrict it from both the right and the left. If I had to sum up my beliefs as concisely as possible, I would say, "Stay out of my wallet and my bedroom," "your liberty stops at my nose," and "don't tread on me." I will believe that things are taking a turn for the better in America when married gays are able to, and do, maintain large arsenals of automatic weapons, and tax collectors are, and do, not.

Comments are closed.