Call Me Crazy, But….
Bill Quick

David Brooks: I’ve smoked weed but you probably shouldn’t be allowed to « Hot Air

What we’re really arguing about here is how many people would or should be sacrificed in a legalization regime versus a prohibition one. Brooks wants to save some fraction of pot users who wouldn’t try the drug but for legalization and will become consumed with it once they do. Legalizers want to save that fraction of pot users who, like David Brooks, have no problem managing their use and may eventually “age out” of it but end up in prison anyway because they got caught. How many of the latter should be sacrificed for the former? Or vice versa?

How about we just legalize drugs and let the sacrifices be made by those who personally choose to do so, rather than those who run afoul of the all-encompassing tyranny of the enforcer state?

BTW, just so you know:  I don’t pay any attention to David Brooks about anything, given his tendency to masturbate to pictures of Barack Obama’s trouser creases.

This entry was posted in Liberty and Tyranny, War On Some Drugs by Bill Quick. Bookmark the permalink.
Bill Quick

About Bill Quick

I am a small-l libertarian. My primary concern is to increase individual liberty as much as possible in the face of statist efforts to restrict it from both the right and the left. If I had to sum up my beliefs as concisely as possible, I would say, "Stay out of my wallet and my bedroom," "your liberty stops at my nose," and "don't tread on me." I will believe that things are taking a turn for the better in America when married gays are able to, and do, maintain large arsenals of automatic weapons, and tax collectors are, and do, not.

Comments

Call Me Crazy, But…. — 3 Comments

Return to main page →
At this post →