Iranian Craziness
What is Iran Planning for Thursday?
My vote goes to the “huge, bloody crackdown” option. To be followed by gasps of shock and amazement from the usual dumbasses, who “never expected the tottering regime to do something like that.”
-
February 9th, 2010 | #1
An odds on fav is nothing at all. Several previous deadlines passed with nothing happening.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #2
Iran detonates a nuke.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #3
Dinnerjacket will claim credit for the D.C. blizzards and threaten to keep doing it until he’s paid a ransom of one million dollars.
Dumbasses Strike Back
WH: Some Critics ‘Serving the Goals of al Qaeda’ - Political Punch
In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan — Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism — responds to critics of the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies by saying “Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Yep, yep, anybody who doesn’t like The Obama’s national defense policies is not only racist, but also in league with Al-Qaeda.
Good move, guys. I predict you crack Rasmussen’s 20 level of disapproval within a month. Things like this Beavis and O’Butthead move will drive the drop.
Crazy Like A Fox
Obama Official Criticizes Hike in Anthem Blue Cross Rate | TopNews United States
California insurance regulators have ordered Anthem Blue Cross to delay controversial rate increases of as much as 39% for individual policies, hikes that have landed subscribers and brokers in frenzy.
The Obama administration summoned California’s largest for-profit insurer to pose a justification its rate lifts, revealing that the increases were alarming at a time when subscribers face soaring healthcare costs.
Amazing. A 40% price hike just as socialized medicine is breathing its last - and the Obama administration comes riding to the rescue. You’d almost think that the HealthCos are suicidal - or that they stand to make a ton of money from ObmamaCare if they can somehow resuscitate it.
But that’s just crazy talk, isn’t it?
Fee Fi Fo Fooey
Google cuts fee to break Nexus One contract - USATODAY.com
WASHINGTON — Google has lowered by $200 the fee it charges customers who break a standard two-year contract for its new Nexus One phone on the T-Mobilenetwork.
The Google fee was dropped to $150 from $350, but customers who break a contract on the phone will still have to pay an early termination fee of $200 to T-Mobile.
Still sounds pricy, but there is this:
The lower “equipment recovery fee” on the Nexus One, which took effect on Jan. 4, will apply to customers who break their contract after the 14-day trial period but before 120 days. Customers who break the contract after 120 days will not have to pay any fee.
That’s even better.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #1
The 120 day end has, I’m pretty sure, always been there.
Ad Hoc
10 best Super Bowl ads of all time - Business of Super Bowl XLIV- msnbc.com
Some of these were pretty good.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #1
Good ads, but the over the top moralizing and bitching I could do without.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #2
The bottom credits a San Francisco newspaper columnist for the copy, which (sorry, Bill) might help explain its nagging, scolding bullshit.
Porkulus, not Jobs
Jobs bill: A chance for bipartisanship or election strategy? - CNN.com
Washington (CNN) — As Senate Democrats look to pass a jobs bill before Presidents Day, experts say the debate is an opportunity to see if calls for bipartisanship will be answered.
Understand that in CNN’s world, “bipartisanship” has only one meaning - that Republicans should supinely rubber stamp any initiative the leftist Democrats dream up.
Let’s get one thing clear: government cannot create jobs. Any money used to attempt this must come from one of two sources - either the pockets of taxpayers, so that it cannot be spent or invested to actually create new jobs, or borrowed in such a way that it crowds out legitimate job-creating investments in favor of government bonds, which create nothing.
So CNN blats about bipartisan support for the latest Democrat Porkulus Spendulus Stimulus, another bloated bag of boodle for Friends of Obama and other Democrats. Merely by naming the New Porkulus a “jobs bill,” CNN reveals where its true loyalties lie: in acting as a propaganda shill for the left and the Democrat party.
Another Obama Fail
Iran plans to build 10 more nuclear plants - latimes.com
Reporting from Paris and Beirut - As Iran moved to enrich uranium to a higher level of purity and build new nuclear-fuel plants, U.S. and French defense officials suggested Monday that sanctions were needed to force Tehran to curb its nuclear program.
Speaking in Paris, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates again dismissed military action but said that given Iran’s rejections of Western proposals, the international community needed to apply some pressure.
How’s that “Diplomatic Change” working out for you, President Dumbass and all your dumbass followers?
Let me explain it in terms simple enough for you to understand. Iran’s goal is Shia domination of the Middle East. In order for them to succeed, they must become a nuclear power - at least that is how they see it. For you to demand that they not become a nuclear power is to demand that they give up the justification for their regime - the triumph of the Shia sect in the Muslim world.
In short, you are demanding that they commit suicide, but you are not offering any threats against the regime itself. Any sanctions will fall on the people, not the leaders and, in fact, as under Saddam, will be used to strengthen the regime itself.
You are a fool and a failure, Obama, and we will be well rid of you when we finally throw you out of office after your utterly failed first term. Unfortunately, we will then have to deal with all your mistakes and failures, among which both a nuclear North Korea and a nuclear Iran will rank high.
Is Audi showing us the future?
It’s only an ad. Or is it?
-
February 9th, 2010 | #1
Truthfully, it took me a sec to figure out that it was a parody. Considering where Britain is now, and where we seem to be heading, I thought it might be an Al Gore PSA.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #2
So…the guy in the Audi is like, smart? Cool? Or knuckling under to the fascists? Sorry. I don’t get it at all, and that’s a little too close to some people’s reality to be a useful parody.
Actually, in a parody, the guy would be driving a smoke-belching SUV with tractor tires right through the roadblock, crushing everything in his path, including the storm troopers and their little dogs, while the Airplane sang “Up against the wall, motherfuckers!” (Those were the days.)
-
February 9th, 2010 | #3
Not a parody, fellas. Not hardly. “They’re not here to judge,” just to “collectively help guide consumers to make the right decision when it comes to the environment” — and not a trace of irony in sight.
And nemo, didn’t you know that simpering, pantywaisted compliance with authority is the new “cool” in the Age of Obama? The ones who had faded old “Question Authority” bumper stickers on their cars are now…Authority. They’re taking to it just a tad too easily and happily if you ask me. And again, without a hint of irony, or any evident awareness of its existence, even.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #4
Nemo’s with Mike on this one.
One less porker.
Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, a powerful and controversial force in congressional spending on defense, died Monday at age 77.
Don’t expect me to grieve for a renowned porker and a man who railroads innocent Marines.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #1
Speak nothing but good of the dead?
Fine.
He’s dead. Good.
Awwww…..
I thought of killing myself, says climate scandal professor Phil Jones - Times Online
THE scientist at the centre of the “climategate” email scandal has revealed that he was so traumatised by the global backlash against him that he contemplated suicide.
Poor guy. I think we’re supposed to feel sorry for him. Of course, it would never occur to him that he brought it all on himself. And yes, he still stands by the “science” of global warming 100%.
I am somehow managing to restrain my sympathy for him.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #1
Phil should remember that Suicide is painless.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #2
wow! From “Master of the Universe” to whimpering victim in a mere matter of months. Not a bad scalp for the blogosphere.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #3
Not a bad scalp for the blogosphere.
And, arguably, the most important one so far…
Huh?
Mullings An American Cyber Column By Rich Galen
PUBLIC SERVICE ALERT
The Federal government is closed today in the National Capital Area. Please let me know if you notice.
END PUBLIC SERVICE ALERT
Who? What?
Palin - 1, Leftards - 0.
Screaming on the left over Sarah writing notes on her hand. Sarah’s response.

Via BigGov and Daylife.
DU is not amused. They seem to think it’s “childish”. I thnk making a big deal about 6 words written on her hand is just plain stupid.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #1
We’ve got a flap-eared Affirmative-Action serial liar and all-around Socialist ego-tripper at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave who’s in thrall to TOTUS, and the Demonrat hordes are havin’ a hissy over a six-word crib on a Republican palm…
DU’s still splattering its moronic mewlings on the Intartubes? I would have thought those bozos choked to death on their own insipid poison-pen rabid Leftism back around 2004 - 5.
Nice to see the ex-Icebox* Guv’s maintaining her sense of humor in the face of the Lefty Loon Squad’s droolings…
(*Not so “Icebox”, these days - maybe Glowball Wormening, Regional Division?)
At least she’s a pro.
And better looking. Kristen Davis to run for NY governor.

Davis has spoken in the past about running against former Gov. (and alleged former client) Eliot Spitzer - to draw attention to the fact that she served nearly four months on Rikers Island while Client 9 escaped indictment.
“This started out being about Spitzer,” admitted Stone, who in 2007 tipped off the FBI to Spitzer’s hooker habit. “But now that it looks like he won’t run, Kristin still wants to use her celebrity to highlight a reform agenda.”
“I was valedictorian of my high-school class,” said the golden-tressed Davis, sporting a modest black suit but wicked Christian Louboutins with 5-inch heels. “I worked 10 years in finance. I was vice president of a hedge fund. I went on to build a multimillion-dollar business from scratch.”
I wouldn’t say it was from “scratch”. And the business was more honest than most hedge funds.
While branding “taxation as confiscation,” the former escort empress said the legalization of prostitution and marijuana could provide $2.5 billion in revenue to help close the budget gap.
Contradictory but probably the best way to get pot legalized.
“I’m a natural Libertarian,” said Davis, who also embraces gay marriage and the views of the National Rifle Association.
Definitely not a Neo-con.
Davis already has backers. She says that rapper 50 Cent has offered to put his G-Unit staff at her disposal. Northern California pot growers are also said to have promised contributions. And then there are Davis’ former clients, some of whom are quite wealthy.
“They may be inclined to contribute to keep her from revealing their names,” said one insider. “Or because they agree with her on the issues.”
I’m inclined to believe it’s “to keep her from revealing their names”.
“Unlike other candidates, she has nothing to hide,” said Stone
Duh.
Via BigGov
-
February 8th, 2010 | #1
Dang!! Now, that’s “progressive”!!
Talk about “stage presence” - even a Pat Robertson or a George Voinovich would have a tough time going head-to-head (so to speak…) with those two - er - that one…
…the former escort empress said the legalization of prostitution and marijuana could provide $2.5 billion in revenue to help close the budget gap.
COYOTE and NORML, here’s your candidate!!
…“I’m a natural Libertarian,” said Davis…
Yes, well, we can pretty much see that…
If she’s even suspected of hiding anything - I hereby volunteer for the search team!…
Proof he’s an idiot.
New sanctions on Iran are only path left: Gates
No , there’s always the nuclear option. Or you could just transfer the troops from Iraq and Afghanistan to Tehran.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #1
Just because they’ve never worked in the past doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use them!
-
February 8th, 2010 | #2
New sanctions on Iran are only path left:
New sanctions?
What’s the matter, didn’t the old ones work?
-
February 8th, 2010 | #3
Sanctions can and will work. They’ve just never been done right yet.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #4
Exactly right, Steve - This is, of course, “done right”…
(Warning: Image may take awhile to download)
I wonder why.
Climate scepticism ‘on the rise’, BBC poll shows
The Populus poll of 1,001 adults found 25% did not think global warming was happening, an increase of 10% since a similar poll was conducted in November.
The percentage of respondents who said climate change was a reality had fallen from 83% in November to 75% this month.
And only 26% of those asked believed climate change was happening and “now established as largely man-made”.
The findings are based on interviews carried out on 3-4 February.
In November 2009, a similar poll by Populus - commissioned by the Times newspaper - showed that 41% agreed that climate change was happening and it was largely the result of human activities.
I Must Have Missed It
Hitchens attacks Gore Vidal for being a ‘crackpot’ - News, People - The Independent
As literary feuds go it has the all the hallmarks of a classic. In one corner, the journalist and polemicist Christopher Hitchens. In the other, America’s great man of letters, Gore Vidal.
I’m sorry, but when did Vidal become “America’s great man of letters?”
Sarah Palin as President? Why Is That Ridiculous?
Glenn Reynolds offers a Sarah Palin speech roundup here.
I don’t have anything to say about her speech that hasn’t already been said. But what I’d like to do is confront head-on the carefully crafted meme Palin’s enemies on the left and within the RINO wing of the GOP (and yes, I’m talking about you, John McCain and that whole dog’s breakfast of a campaign crew that has been flailing wildly away at Palin ever since she kept your prexy run from being stomped even worse than it was).
The meme boils down to this: She’s not a real pol. She hasn’t got the credentials, the education, the experience, or the smarts to be President.
Well, let’s take a look at the “credentialed” Presidents we’ve had over the past half century or so. First, Obama. We think he’s credentialed - although he won’t show us his grades. He had a couple of years as a Senator, a month or two in state offices, and he was a college sort-of professor. But we aren’t supposed to even utter Palin’s name in the same sentence with Obama’s, if we are talking qualifications.
Prior to that, we had Yalie-Harvard scion of political family George Bush, a two-time governor of Texas. All he did was destroy the GOP brand, and enable every two-bit dictator except for the one who tried to kill his dad to go ahead with their nefarious deeds. He also trashed the constitution, expanded the power and control of government, and launched the largest new entitlement program since FDR.
Before that, there was multi-elected former governor BJ Clinton. He trashed his office, tried to nationalize health care (and failed) and was kept under control solely because his early mis-steps caused the GOP to get a large congressional majority to stymie any furter encroachments on the public purse.
He was preceded by George Bush Senior, the ultimate in credentialism, the President who suffered a bad case of bellus interruptus, who managed to squander the highest presidential approval rating in history to become a one term President, thanks to the fact that when we read his lips, we noticed that he was a liar and a fool.
More on the next guy in a bit. Before him, another governor, a “nuclear scientist,” and possibly the worst President of the last century, the man who nearly singlehandedly jumpstarted Islamic terror as a method of attacking the United States - successfully.
Before him, a placeholder who wasn’t all that bad, but wasn’t very good, either, even though he boasted decades of government experience.
And before Ford, there was Nixon, a RINO in crook’s clothing, also credentialed out the wazoo. Before Nixon, LBJ, a man with a legendary rep as a politician who was hounded from office after giving us Vietnam as we came to hate it, and before LBJ, JFK, all the right schools, the right history, a Congressman and a Senator who actually completed a term in the Senate and was re-elected before seeking the White House. He is remembered more for Camelot - the shining liberal dream - than for anything concrete he actually managed to accomplish.
Which leaves the two best Presidents of the past fifty or so years, Eisenhower and Reagan. Eisenhower was a soldier, and a great one, but he had zero American political experience. After he left the military, he was President of Columbia, and then headed up the newly-organizing NATO before being drafted by the GOP as its candidate. And then there was Reagan. Two terms as governor of California comprised this actor’s political record before reaching the Oval Office. The left mocked him as a “Bedtime for Bonzo” moron. Yet he was the best President we’ve had since FDR, and FDR tops him only for winning WWII, and not for his domestic record, which was disastrous.
Both Eisenhower and Reagan behaved as if they not only respected common people, but were common folks themselves. They both attained great success leading our nation. I don’t see anything in this history that automatically disqualifies a woman like Sarah Palin from doing likewise.
I think a lot of Americans agree with me, too.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #1
the left and within the RINO wing of the GOP
Redundancy alert.
FDR tops him only for winning WWII
As a general thing, a man is not lauded for saving your life if he was the one who endangered it.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #2
… [Bush 2] launched the largest new entitlement program since FDR.
Uh, Medicare?
Also, a very good, but seriously under-credentialed president was Harry Truman. He made tough and correct decisions both at the end of WWII (A-Bombs) and at the beginning of the WWIII aka Cold War (Marshall Plan, Berlin Airlift, Korea).
-
February 8th, 2010 | #3
Sorry, Deanz, a brain-burp: I meant since LBJ’s Great Society.
Truman is seriously overrated, by the way.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #4
Truman is seriously overrated, by the way.
Maybe, but I give him a lot of credit for dropping the bomb-twice- in order to end WWII with minimal loss of life. It was the smart thing, and the right thing, to do. No matter what else he may or may not have accomplished, that gives him a big thumbs up from me.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #5
The meme boils down to this: She’s not a real pol. She hasn’t got the credentials, the education, the experience, or the smarts to be President.
To the people that are supporting her that is a feature not a bug. They are sick and tired of the “pols” and the “smarter than you” crowd.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #6
Reagan won WW III and practically didn’t have to fire a shot.
Reagan trumps FDR.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #7
Since being selected as McCain’s running mate she has never held a press conference. Not a single one. I don’t think the numbskull has ever had an original thought. Plus, she’s a congenital liar. Talk about a cult of personality.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #8
Since being selected as McCain’s running mate she has never held a press conference. Not a single one.
That’s why Obama is the perfect president for you, Judson. All he does is hold pressers - and tv interviews, and teleprompter fests, and make endless, droning speeches. Of course, he’s also a serial liar, so I assume you mean your similar characterization of Palin as a compliment.
As for dumb, the only thing we know about her grades comes from a WaPo report that says she was an honor student in high school:
Sally Jenkins on Sarah Palin’s Alaska Roots - washingtonpost.com
Of course, we know absolutely nothing about Barack Obama’s grades anywhere at any time. Still, Obama is failing in a major way, and Palin seems to be garnering more support every day, while Obama is now ringing up some of the worst approval ratings for this time in a new prexy term in history. History may well decide who is the smarter of the two. I’m willing to wait.
She scares the hell out of you, doesn’t she, Judson? It must be a nightmare for you. You get everything you thought you wanted out of 2008, and now it’s all slipping away.
I feel for you. But I predicted this would happen, and you can’t imagine how happy I am to see it coming to pass. A Republican in the sacred Kennedy seat. Socialized medicine dead, and burying the Democrats right along with it.
And Sarah Palin haunting your dreams.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #9
With Judson around, you never have to ask yourself, if an intestinal fistula could talk, what would it say?
Speaking of fisting, how’s your love life doing, Judhead? Still keeping Unilever’s sales up? If you have trouble raising the money to keep up with your needs, I’m sure you can find gainful employment. After all, the Goatse site lost its hallmark image and the goatsex guy is reputedly dead. (Don’t worry. Just like shoving that first baseball bat where the sun don’t shine, getting a job hurts only the first time.)
Well, I’d love to stay and chat, but getting too near a congenital moron makes me feel icky. Sort of like you’d feel if you came within shouting distance of a reasoned opinion.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #10
Bill Q:
I feel for you.
How Clintonesque, two Bills in a pod. 8-)
-
February 8th, 2010 | #11
To be Clintoneque, it would be
I feel you
But that would be applied only if Judson were a young, not-too-bright woman. Judhead has the not-too-bright bit going strong, but “puerile” is not the same as “young” and the only woman’s bits he’s ever been near were his mother’s.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #12
>> I don’t think the numbskull has ever had an original
>> thought. Plus, she’s a congenital liar..You are obviously a woman hater. It would probably help if you didn’t make the assumption that all women are like your mother.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #13
Plus Reagan had to do what he did with a major portion of the country actively working against us winning, plus a media and Hollywood propaganda machine that had a sizeabole portion of the electorate thinking it was unwinnable for the US at best and going to end in nuclear armageddon under Reagan at worst. There may have been some overlap in those 2 groups as well ;>D
FDR had pretty much the country behind him in the war effort and Media/Hollywood for the most part actually supporting that as well.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #14
Howard Kurtz notices something about that Obama press conference thing:
Problem solved: President Obama hasn’t held a full-scale news conference since July. Instead, he answered a dozen people’s questions last week on YouTube, most of them easily finessed and — extra bonus! — no annoying follow-ups of the kind posed by real, live journalists.
NBC White House reporter Chuck Todd calls the situation a “shame,” saying the administration is trying to control the message rather than allowing Obama to be seen “unscripted.”
Still, a press corps that periodically complained about George W. Bush’s infrequent news conferences should not let Obama walk away from the practice unchallenged. And some of its members have protested. Reid raised the issue with Gibbs at a briefing last month, and Hearst columnist Helen Thomas said the president has “gone an obscenely long time, not holding one.”
“What’s lost is the ability to get beyond talking points,” says Michael Shear, a White House reporter for The Post. “This is a president and White House that know how to be very scripted and very on message. . . . Frankly, we make our living studying and following details of these issues so we can zero our questions in on where the real tension lies in a particular issue.”
But while the administration may view televised news conferences as very 20th century — Jack Kennedy began the practice in 1961 — it remains a valuable tradition. It would be ironic if the president who seemed to win over the media while running for office were to wind up stiff-arming those who cover him most closely.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #15
Judson, Judson, Judson,
I don’t think the numbskull has ever had an original thought. Plus, she’s a congenital liar.
A know-nothing, talking about something he knows nothing about.
I have mixed feelings about Palin. But having seen her in action in Juneau, having watched what happens when she is in charge, you are absolutely wrong.
As I said, I have my reservations regarding Palin, but I have fewer with her than any democrat and most republicans. -
February 8th, 2010 | #16
A Republican in the sacred Kennedy seat. Socialized medicine dead, and burying the Democrats right along with it
Add: Guantanomo still open for business, troops still in Iraq, increased troops still in Afghanistan, rendition still ocurring. Why one would think Dick Cheney hisself was behind the scenes pulling the strings. Cap ‘n Trade DOA. Global warming hysteria is done. November ‘10 looking like a historic “change”.
But hey, he has driven the debt to levels that will damage us for years to come, so he has accomplished one lefty wet dream.
I’d vote for Palin just to twist the knife a bit.
-
February 9th, 2010 | #17
I don’t think the numbskull has ever had an original thought. Plus, she’s a congenital liar.
Now, Judson, you’re assuming facts not in evidence. Whilst I grant that nothing has shown it to be the case, rumor has it that Barry is a man.
Obama, Tribealism, and Physics - A Chorus of Stupid
Pajamas Media » Obama vs. Einstein
A renowned physicist demolishes a paper by Laurence Tribe, that President Obama played some roll in crafting, on the “revolutionary” aspects and legal implications of 20th century physics.
via Instapundit comes this delightful demolishing of liberal pretensions to an understanding of a real science, physics.
My fondest wish is that Larry Tribe, his Obama-like ego punctured, will offer to publicly debate Tipler on the physics herein discussed.
I’d pay to see that one.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #1
I’m not that great of a physicist, but even I could see that Barry’s nonsense was just that. Still, it brings a smile to my face to see a physicist of some repute taking the nail-studded cluebat to The Won.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #2
Obama played some roll in crafting
“I am grateful to Rob Fisher, Michael Dorf, Kenneth Cheseboro, Gene Sperling and Barack Obama for their analytic and research assistance”
Sounds like Tribe had students write his paper. -
February 8th, 2010 | #3
Going out on a limb here but…
The key thesis of the Obama-Tribe paper is contained in the opening sentences of its abstract: “Twentieth-century physics revolutionized our understanding of the physical world. Relativity theory replaced a view of the universe as made up of isolated objects acting upon one another at a distance with a model in which space itself was curved and changed by the presence and movement of objects. Quantum physics undermined the confidence of scientists in their ability to observe and understand a phenomenon without fundamentally altering it in the process.”
All of these sentences are completely wrong
They are? They are completely wrong?
In Newtonian theory, gravity is space-time curvature just as it is in general relativity. In fact, Einstein’s general relativity is just a special case of Newtonian gravity theory incorporating the ether. Quantum physics is also just a special case of Newtonian mechanics in its wave-particle formulation (called Hamilton-Jacobi theory) incorporating the very modest requirement that this formulation be mathematically consistent. Hamilton-Jacobi theory is deterministic, hence quantum mechanics is equally deterministic. There was absolutely nothing revolutionary about twentieth century physics. There has been no “paradigm shift” in physics. The magnificent intellectual edifice created by Isaac Newton stands unshaken.
There was absolutely nothing revolutionary about twentieth century physics?
I dunno, I wouldn’t need much convincing that Tribama’s paper is nonsense and scientifically challenged, but the above doesn’t do it for me.
The quoted lines from that abstract sound as if they could have been lifted from any random physics textbook.
If, as Tipler claims, that abstract is completely wrong, then he’s damning far more than that paper.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #4
The more I think about, the more I’m convinced Tipler is making much ado about nothing.
In Newtonian theory, gravity is space-time curvature just as it is in general relativity.
Well, yes and no. Newton’s theory of gravitation, formulated in the language of Newtonian mechanics, is force at a distance.
However, Newton’s theory, like any other, can be formulated in the same language of that of General Theory of Relativity.
From MWT “Gravitation” that Tipler references:
Any physical theory originally written in a special coordinate system can be recast in geometric, coordinate-free language. Newtonian theory is a good example, with its equivalent geometric and standard formulations.
Nature must love general relativity and it must hate Newtonian theory. Of all theories ever conceived by physicists, general relativity has the simplest, most elegant geometric foundation.
By contrast, what diabolically clever physicist would ever foist on man a theory with such a complicated geometric foundation as Newtonian theory?
This quote hardly seems to support Tipler’s view of GR as a special case of Newtonian gravity. In fact, according to MTW, it is clear that Newtonian theory, cast in the language of space-time curvature, is ad-hoc in the extreme.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #5
I agree with Alfred (surprise, surprise).
The evolution of the wave function is deterministic. What will happen isn’t, unless you assert the interpretation of Hugh Everett III that the universe splits into bajillions of universes every nanosecond. The problem is, you can’t predict which universe you are going to find yourself in - a copy of you is in each on of them but you find yourself in only one of them, and which one of them that is, is unpredictable. Since you are in all of them, you could end up as any one of those yous. So while the wave function evolves deterministically, the result of an experiment done by you is indeterminate. Since the sine qua non of science is experiment, to me Hugh Everett’s interpretation is a load of BS. It is a God’s eye viewpoint if it is right, not what a human can detect. It satisfies the Pythagoreans amongst physicists, those who think the universe is just mathematics, but there is nothing scientific about a belief that the universe is just mathematics. If you are a determinism freak, too, Hugh Everett’s is your interpretation.
The older and more widely accepted interpretation is the Copenhagen interpretation in which the wave function gives the probability of an event (actually the modulus squared of the wave function gives the probability density). In the Copenhagen interpretation, there is just one universe.
The article Tipler is denouncing uses 20th century physics as a metaphor for socialist ideas, which any physicist would denounce. Tipler has made as dramatic a denunciation of the metaphor as possible, but he has asserted things that are controversial at best as the received truth.
Don’t take my word for it. Here is Bernard Beard, a physicist I used to talk to, objecting to Tipler’s attitude that Hugh Everett’s interpretation is a proof that the universe is deterministic in the comments to another one of Tipler’s Pajamas Media articles.
I also have Gravitation by Wheeler, et al. You could cast Newtonian gravity as curved space but Newtonian gravity is linear and relativistic gravity is non linear, so I don’t see how relativistic gravity could be considered a special case of Newtonian gravity.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #6
Newtonian gravity could be cast as a curvature of space, but relativistic gravity is a curvature of spacetime. It is the involvement of time that makes relativistic gravity non linear.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #7
As I understand it, in the geometric formulation of Newtonian gravity, spacetime is stratified into spacelike slices by a universal time coordinate and the geometry of each slice is Euclidean, i.e., uncurved. To quote “Gravitation” again:
If the space slices are really so flat, where do curvature and geodesic deviation enter in? They are properties of spacetime.
…
Geodesics of a space slice that are initially parallel remain always parallel. But geodesics of spacetime (trajectories of freely falling particles) initially parallel get pried apart or pushed together by spacetime curvature.
pgs 291 - 292.
So, as I understand it, it is the spacetime that is curved, i.e., the Reimann tensor does not vanish; but it is curved in a very artificial way such that that a spacetime metric cannot be defined as it is in GR.
Is that more or less what you are saying?
-
February 8th, 2010 | #8
Besides the multiverse and Copenhagen interpretations, there is also the Roger Penrose “Objective Reduction” approach to quantum physics. Despite Tipler’s rant, these are all about as far from classical physics as you can get. Personally, Penrose’s interpretation has considerable appeal as it follows in the traditions of de Chardin and Whitehead.
Also, I don’t see how Einstein’s gravity theory can ever be considered a special case of Newton’s. Time is absolute for Newton; certainly not curved. Also, EM waves do not “feel” gravity for Newton.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #9
I’m a pragmatist, not a theorist. As such, I’m inclined to throw rocks at all of their heads. “See? The rock leaves my hand with velocity V. It is acted upon my gravity and wind, and impacts your head at position P. Is that Newtonian or Einsteinian? What’s that? Concussion? Gee, sorry.”
-
February 8th, 2010 | #10
That being said, from an engineering perspective, Newtonian dynamics is a special case of General (or Special) Relativity.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #11
deanz1, gravity bends the trajectory of em waves in Newtonian physics too. The amount of bending is different for relativistic and Newtonian gravity. In fact, even black holes exist in Newtonian physics too.
Alfred, nope, it’s not what I was saying, and I was wrong.
I had thought Newtonian gravity cast as curvature differed from relativistic gravity in that there would be no curvature in 2 dimensional spacetime slices but there would be curvature in space slices, but you are right, it is the other way around. It’s easy to see too, when you think about it. If it was just space slices that were curved, then trajectories between two points in a gravitational field would be independant of velocity. A baseball thrown through a hole in a wall would follow the same path as a bullet fired from the same point - which is obviously wrong.
I’ve carried that incorrect idea around in my head for years.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #12
Indeed, SteveF, engineering based solely on Newtonian dynamics would not have succeeded in designing the GPS system. Both Special and General Relativity must be used.
I Don’t See the Problem Here
MORE ILLINOIS DEVELOPMENTS: Dem. Ill. lt. gov. candidate exits race amid furor. “The pawn broker and owner of a cleaning supplies company won the nomination Tuesday. Since then, it has become widely know that he was accused of abusing his ex-wife and holding a knife to the throat of an ex-girlfriend.”
I don’t know why this would be considered a liability. Sounds like a typical Dem Chicago Way pol to me.
Profits First, Safety Never In the Picture at All
2/5/2010 - Cleveland Taking Down Red Light Cameras - Breaking News - Chattanoogan.com
Cleveland city officials said red light cameras in the city seem to be effective, but the company furnishing the cameras has asked that the cameras come down.
Accordingly, they will be removed at the end of March.
The firm that supplied the cameras said both it and the city have been losing money on the operation.
A statement from the city manager’s office said, “The city of Cleveland is in a contract with Traffipax, Inc. for an automated traffic light enforcement system (red light cameras). The red light camera program has demonstrated safety as well as a decrease in accidents per statistics shown below:
Click to learn more…Pre-Camera FY08
Post- Camera FY09
Paul Huff/Keith 59 20
25th/Keith 46 23
20th/Keith 7 4
Raider/Keith 5 10
25th/Peerless 19 18“On Feb. 1 the city received a letter from Traffipax, Inc., requesting the
removal of cameras at each location. Therefore, the red light cameras will be decommissioned by March 31, 2010.”
These damned things are never about anything more than how much money in hidden taxes and fees they can raise for whatever government body installs them. Anybody with more than half a brain knows this. Of course, this means that most liberals, and certain all nanny-statists, haven’t a clue about the real purpose of these surveillance-state monstrosities.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #1
Traffic-law “violation enforcement” methods of any sort that result primarily in fines have almost nothing to do with safety. Whether it’s ticketing by cops or ticketing by cameras, it’s always, first and foremost, about the money.
If that wasn’t true, flagrant and outrageous speeders and drunk drivers would lose their licenses - instantly and automatically - on first offense, and be jailed just as quickly and automatically on a second offense.
Any statistical “proof” that is offered to try to support such schemes fall into the “…lies, damned lies and statistics…” category - just more “junk science”, like AGW.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #2
Yeah, last month Tampa FL, installed 30 cameras and insisted the weren’t about revenue enhancement because they were paying a flat fee of ~$5,000/month/camera for them.
The stats came back and showed that the cameras issued 30,000 tickets the first month(at $125/ticket). $3,750,000 - $150,000 cost per month = $3,600,000 profit for the month.
Global Warming Hits Washington, D.C.
Olympian Snow: A Brief Tour - Kathryn Jean Lopez

A bunch of cool, er, downright frigid snaps of D.C. buried under several feet of global warming.
Is Big Honest Al Gore, the Snake Oil Man, in town or something? I wonder if this will “cool” the ardor of watermelon Dems for destroying the American economy to save it from all this globule warmening?
-
February 7th, 2010 | #1
The whole report from Dr. Jeff Masters, one of the founders of Weather Underground (www.wunderground.com). The satellite view, and the photos contributed by readers, are priceless as well.
I wonder if this will “cool” the ardor of watermelon Dems…?
Of course not - “Climate change, dammit - it’s climate change - and this is just more definitive proof of it! Now, knock off that sneering - this is serious stuff !!…”
So…in that picture up above, how many of those do you suppose are “carbon footprints”?…
-
February 7th, 2010 | #2
With 5 people shoveling it took 12 hours between Saturday and Sunday to move all of the white globull warming that I needed to move. The roof on the back of my house had drifted to over 3 feet of snow, most roofs are not designed for that kind of load and since we are supposed to receive more snow on Tuesday, my son and I spent about 6 hours shoveling off the roof while my wife and 2 daughters started the driveway. We finished the driveway on Sunday working from 9:00 AM until 3:00 PM. The road in front of my house was a 1 lane path until about 8:00 AM Sunday and as of this posting still is not fully cleared.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #3
drach. They got these things called “snow blowers”. I admit getting one up on the roof might be more trouble than it’s worth. I on the other hand need something called a “high pressure water pump”.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #4
I used something better than a “snow blower”. Teenagers with shovels.
2+ feet of Gore-ball warming.
I thought I saw a couple of polie bears looking for CBS reporters wander by.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #5
Northern Minnesota: several inches of fluffy
snowAlgor dandruff, several more expected. I sure am glad I don’t live in southern areas, where AGW hits harder. -
February 8th, 2010 | #6
Damn, is the only place in the country that is enjoying GlowBull warming, Alaska? I was able to finish weeding one garden, and now have started cutting brush. It is like spring here in Southeast Alaska.
The Winter Olympics is suffering from our Alaska Spring as well. Would someone please notify AlGore to head toward Vancouver. They need some of his dandruff or the ski slopes are going to be sub-prime. -
February 8th, 2010 | #7
The snow did some good. Federal Government Closed on Monday
-
February 8th, 2010 | #8
Genes, for good reason as of this morning the roads in DC still have at least 12″ of snow on them and are next to impassable. We are expected to get between 5 and 8 more inches of snow on Tuesday if that happens it will close the city down completely.
I Case You Wondered…
I’m rooting for the Naptown Colts in the Big Game today.
How else? I’m from Indiana.
And if you want to be a fool in public, post your score predictions here.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #1
Indy 42, Aint 35
-
February 7th, 2010 | #2
I should add, in a squeeker.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #3
O.k., I’ll play a round…
Colts 34
(S)Aints 21
The Big (Not So) Easy goes marchin’ out…
(Who Dat, indeed…)
Update (Subsequent to the final score…): Sadly consistent with my usual degree of success in sports prediction - didn’t even get the point spread (in reverse) right…
Precisely why I don’t bet sports anymore - the last time I won at that, Denny McClain won 31 games for the Detroit Tigers (and the Colts lost the Super-Duper Bowl that season, too…)
Oh, well - guess Mardi Gras starts early, this year.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #4
As a left-wing kind of guy, I want to predict the results to my MSM readers in Louisiana.
I predict that the Saints will have a great day, and will end up very close to the top but in second place. Whereas Indiana will have a terrible day, and end the day next to the bottom. -
February 7th, 2010 | #5
Geaux Saints!
I’m just hoping for a Saints win, if only for the spectacle of an even longer NOLA Mardi Gras. Straight out partying from tonight until Ash Wednesday? That would be a sight to see.
Never liked the Colts in Balmer. Like ‘em even less in Naptown.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #6
Was at the TP convention in Gnashville. Didn’t walk away a firm believer in Sarah!.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #7
Weaux, Saints!
-
February 7th, 2010 | #8
I got here too late to make a prediction.* Which is too bad. I’d have predicted that the game was interrupted by an outbreak of rampant Global Warming and that both teams** and most of the spectators would die of hypothermia. Oh, well, maybe next year.
* Or at least a prediction of future events. I guess I could make a prediction of past events, and then use secret data and confidential algorithms to prove that my prediction was timely and accurate. Do you think I could get grant money and a Nobel prize for that?
** I can’t identify them by name. I don’t know who’s playing, aside from remarks above. Don’t care, either. I’d rather watch a gaggle of transvestite rodeo clowns slap each other on the ass than the Super Bowel.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #9
Do you think I could get grant money and a Nobel prize for that?
Probably not - you’re neither a “recognized academic
liarresearcher” nor an Affirmative-Action POTUS. You could maybe get your own personalized hockey-stick, though……I’d rather watch a gaggle of transvestite rodeo clowns slap each other on the ass…
Now, that would, indeed, make some prime-time TeeVee watching - you could probably put it on Pay-Per-View, billed as “Congressional Health-Care Reform Negotiations” - reality programming at it’s finest…
Personally, I have to confess - I didn’t actually watch the Super-Duper Bubble. See, there was this kinda-cool Western rerun on, called Dances With Indians, or some such…
I took a peek at some of the commercials, though - found out roughly how many Doritos you can pile in a casket, and still have room for the “corpse” and a T.V. screen. Also, even if you used to Own Or Control It All, but get wiped out financially and lose it all, a free bottle of Coke makes it all better, somehow…
Oh, and Go Daddy.com produces such devout ecstasy, women start ripping their clothes off.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #10
In my view, the Saints will win by a score of 31-17.
-
February 8th, 2010 | #11
I take it your view is the rear view?
-
February 8th, 2010 | #12
David appears to have climbed into The Wayback Machine, and turned the dial the wrong way…
-
February 8th, 2010 | #13
Jeez, I get it RIGHT, and STILL I am mocked? Oh, the humanity…
-
February 8th, 2010 | #14
Nice retrodicting, David. You’re doing a better job than the climate models; they can’t even retrodict correctly.
Good Riddance to Bad Rubbish
FOXNews.com - Specter Wins Pennsylvania Democratic Party Backing for Senate Primary Bid
In the latest polls out of The Keystone State, Specter has a comfortable lead over Sestak, but trails his potential general election rival, former Republican Rep. Pat Toomey.
When Specter switched to the Democratic Party last spring, he cited an uphill battle in winning the senatorial GOP primary as one of the reasons behind his decisions.
So Toomey is still going to be able to kick Specter’s worthless RINO ass. Good.
I want to see this professional politurd booted right out of politics and onto the trash heap of history. And I want the same for the party he joined in a futile effort to save his useless skin.
President Blabbermouth Not Connecting
Obama seeks to rally glum Dems amid GOP challenges - Yahoo! News
“We can’t win in 2010 if all we’re doing is celebrating the election of 2008,” said Buckley, who is also vice chairman of the DNC. “We haven’t gotten out the message of this administration’s successes.”
Aside from the obvious question, “What successes?”, if the administration hasn’t “gotten out the message,” the only conclusion that can be reached is that the administration’s chief spokesman, who has been on a compliant MSM’s podium almost daily since his election, is incapable of effective public speaking.
You can also arrive at the same conclusion simply by listening to as much as you can stand of one of his endless, droning, teleprompted encomiums to His Own Wonderful Self.
-
February 7th, 2010 | #1
Amen. How does he get a rep as a good speaker when most of his sentences are 1 or 2 cliches with some filler?
-
February 8th, 2010 | #2
How? Well, the leftstream media would wildly cheer him if he stood up, held a dog food can in his hand, and read the label to them. Which he’d have to do, because without some way to read his own speeches, he’s helpless as a public speaker.
Dumbasses on Parade: Kennedy Chapter
RFK, Jr. 15 months ago: Global warming means no snow or cold in DC | Washington Examiner
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who flies around on private planes so as to tell larger numbers of people how they must live their lives in order to save the planet, wrote a column last year on the lack of winter weather in Washington, D.C.
Since RFK Jr., unlike his father a noted dumbass, seems to believe noting changes in weather patterns means man is changing the climate, perhaps now he will acknowledge the reality of global cooling.
Or perhaps not.
A few amusing videos.
From the Minnesotans For Global Warming. Youtube channel. Some good videos there.
Imagine There’s No Global Warming
From someone else but related and funny.
Al Gore’s Travelin’ Global Warming Show
Horseshit of the Purest Ray Serene
In Kirk’s farewell, a call for return to unity of Kennedy era - The Boston Globe
WASHINGTON - Paul Kirk said a poignant goodbye yesterday to the Senate, invoking the memory of the man he briefly replaced, Edward M. Kennedy, as he implored his colleagues to adopt Kennedy’s bipartisan spirit and get to work on fixing the nation’s problems.
What whooping horseshit. I knew the Kennedys, I worked with the Kennedys, and there was never a moment when they weren’t the toughest partisan brawlers imaginable.
Kirk is gilding a lily that never existed. And, in a typically hypocritical moment, Kirk’s speech itself was nothing other than a long, partisan howl.
-
February 5th, 2010 | #1
Is “ray serene” a Rosicrucian reference? Been many years since I read any of their stuff, but that sounds like something they would say. Lots of various “rays” anyway as I recall.
-
February 5th, 2010 | #2
Ray Serene was Mad Max’s calmer brother.
-
February 5th, 2010 | #3
-
February 5th, 2010 | #4
(Beat Quick to it)
“Full many a gem of purest ray serene
The dark unfathom’d caves of ocean bear:
Full many a flower is born to blush unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert air.”Thomas Gray, “Elegy Written in A County Church-yard”
-
February 5th, 2010 | #5
I think that was Lincoln’s favoite poem. (No, I don’t have anything interesting to add to this thread)
-
February 6th, 2010 | #6
David and all of his reiki comments just reeks! Get rid of the asshole, uh um… please.
[done - SteveF]
Help, I’m Meltinggggg……
India forms new climate change body - Telegraph
India forms new climate change body
The Indian government has established its own body to monitor the effects of global warming because it “cannot rely” on the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the group headed by its own Nobel prize-winning scientist Dr R.K Pachauri.
Apparently that “settled consensus” represented by the UN isn’t quite as settled as everyboob thought.
The Justices Should Refuse to Be Obama Tools
Clarence Thomas on Why He Skips the State of the Union | The Weekly Standard
Thomas offered several reasons for the court’s decision, which I won’t repeat here; but what intrigued me was his parenthetical explanation for his absence from the State of the Union address. “I don’t go because it has become so partisan,” he said, “and it’s very uncomfortable for a judge to sit there. There’s a lot that you don’t hear on TV: The catcalls, the whooping and hollering and under-the-breath comments. One of the consequences is now the court becomes part of the conversation, if you want to call it that, in the speeches. It’s just an example of why I don’t go.”
Obama is an untutored boob. As long as that is the case, I think the justices should stay away. Why let themselves become pawns in his partisan scams?
-
February 5th, 2010 | #1
If anybody hasn’t read Clarence Thomas’ autobiography My Grandfather’s Son, I would highly recommend it. My respect for the man went up significantly after I read his book and I’ve purchased several copies and given them away.

posted by

Anologist David Runciman looks up his own anus to explain why Americans “voted against their own interest” in taking “Kennedy’s” seat from the Democrats.
And so the new word has already been put to use.
I’d like to know what North Carolina Congress critter came up with yet another tax on ability. Sheesh.
An interesting alliance brewing in KY.
When is the immigration reform shoe going to drop? There a few bills out there already, but none if it seems to getting much attention. You know that the progressives can’t resist tackling one of their pet projects, the question is when.
I don’t think that they will really start talking about immigration reform until after the midterm elections, it’s too much of a hot button with voters.
We need to start the conversation with our lawmakers now, make them listen to what we their constituents want, not just the lobbyists trying to buy their vote.
Econ theory bleg:
Am taking an intro to business course and the description of how the Federal Open Market Committee affects money supply is kinda fuzzy.
Where does the FOMC get all the government securities it wants to sell? Can it issue them all on its own? Is there a limit?
Where on the FedGov’s balance sheet do those securities appear, both bought and sold?
I’ll have Skype open this evening and tomorrow evening hoping someone will text or call. I am ‘patriotbrewer’
The Fed was chartered about 1914 IIRC and it is owned by its member banks, who contributed capital for its start up. It has been growing its balance sheet since Day One thru interest and retained earnings (also IIRC most of the profits have to be returned to the US Treasury but it keeps a certain fraction) and it’s ability to create money and lend to the US Government (buy US Treasuries) utilizing fractional reserve banking just like any other bank. I am not sure if there is any limit on the Fed’s ability to create money because I do not think there is any actual reserve requirement for it. Treasury has an account there. It just writes a check to them and deposits it in their account. In the past it was limited in that there had to be gold backing the dollars, but the last vestiges of that disappeared in 1971 when Nixon took us off the gold standard.
Early in 2008 the Fed had a 800 Billion balance sheet, mostly of US Treasury securities and high quality lending facilities. Since then it has expanded its balance to just over 2.1 Trillion through additional lending against mortgage security collateral (the JPM Morgan takeover of Bear Stearns and other “Maiden Lane” vehicles), and has outright purchased US Treasury and mortgaged backed securities from the market.
The Fed is nominally independent of the Fed Gov and the Fed Govt only has oversight of the Fed (semi-annual Humphrey Hawkins reviews but more importantly ratification of Board appointments including the Chairman of the Federal Reserve itself). The US Govt has no ownership in the Fed and the Fed does not appear on the books of the Fed Govt.
Hope this helps but I would do a search on Federal Reserve, check Wikipedia, etc to make sure I got it all correct and fill in the gaps. Check my dates, I’m going from memory and may be off by a year or two!
PS Actually the Fed can “write a check” to any member bank that sells it securities. The Fed would buy the UST from a dealer bank, say Citi, and credit Citi’s account at the Fed with USD.
Voila, more money, just like that.
Isn’t the Fed a wonderful invention?
btw unless you know your prof is a conservative, stick to the facts only (or if you’re a kiss ass praise the Fed, at least as an institution, to high heaven). Most econ profs in US universities probably have wet dreams of being Fed Chairman someday. Bernanke is their hero (Princeton Econ Prof).
Bill, I know you said you were looking for a replacement for Roboform on linux. Did you ever find one? I started using LastPass recently, and it seems to work well on chrome/windows, firefox/ubuntu, and safari/mac.
I just saw this on Yahoo. I chuckled through the ad. California has some interesting political races. I don’t know if Carly will make a good Senator, but from the ad, someone doesn’t like Campbell.
Here’s the website that originated that ad. fcino.com. And Campbell’s wrong the sheep changes to a wolf in sheep’s clothing not a demon sheep. The Man can’t even listen to the ad.
Fiscal Conservative In Name Only in case you were wondering.
DocOb - ditto! It imported all my Robo data, and works fine with Ubuntu.
About the only thing I’m logging into Windows for these days is Quicken.
many thanks, kennycan. Let me paraphrase, and check me if I derail:
open market operations consist entirely of displacing money into the future through T bills. Money tied up in bills redeemable 1 week or 1 month in the future are not in the money supply TODAY, and the money supply of concern is money that can be transacted TODAY.
But the money displaced into the future cannot stay there because TODAY becomes tomorrow, the bills will be redeemed. FOMC gets another chance every few weeks with a given stack of money, to finesse how much cash to move out of today’s supply, and to reappear in the supply in a few weeks.
Ah, the Great State of California …..
Went to Subway for a bite while shopping today. Turns out that if they heat my sandwich, the state adds a 40 cent tax for the privilege.
Presumably to save energy, or for the children, or something.
Have to see what that pitchfork on eBay is going for these days. At least that can be re-used, as opposed to the Tar and Feathers….
They’re lying to you, George. I’ll explain later.
Oh, I can’t wait to hear about this…
Another one!
There was enough information in the article to track down the principal’s email address (emastro-at-ps52-dot-org).
Was the message I sent her out of line?
I had already once removed two of my kids from school for two years in past, so my hypothetical threat to do so here would be no bluff. Since moving to ND, I’ve taken one kid out of one class, a “history” class, mostly taught by videos (a pathetic way to teach). I objected to a section on comparative religion which was going to show some dhimmi fluff about Islam, the religion of peace. The teacher had actually sent around a form listing all the videos that would be shown and offering to accommodate anyone with any particular objection, so I expected that we would end up having William do some other thing for the Islam lesson. Instead, when I telephoned him, he got mad at me and really left me with no choice but to take my son out of the class. This “history” teacher didn’t seem to know anything about the violent expansion of Islam at all.
Just think - I’ve done all this and I’m not even old enough to vote yet.
The ten-dollar e-book may soon be gone, replaced by the
fifteen-dollar eBook.fifteen dollar paperback.
Update:
The principal has apologized. Maybe my email made a difference.
She should be fired.
Here’s the link. That kid sure looks like a future mass murderer doesn’t he?
The Fed buys and sells securities. If it wants to increase the money supply it can buy a security, like a TBill, and if it wants to contract the money supply it sells a security, like a TBill. The Fed deals in longer dated securities as well. If a security matures, it just repeats the process. It also does repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements. This is contracts to buy or sell securities and an agreement by the seller to repurchase them later at a set price. The price is determined by the money market rates and the Fed uses this to adjust money market rates for short term (1 day, 1 week, 1 month) so money market rates remain stable in the short term even though there may be money flows in and out of the market.
The Fed both conducts monetary policy on a short term and a relatively longer term basis using these 2 basic tools.
btw Post WWII the Fed rarely ever (on purpose) outright contracts the money supply in practice. “Tightening” has normally consisted of slowing down the expansion of the money supply.
Just for comparison, here is a schoolyard photo from 1943. But look carefully, the kid with the toy handgun is not pointing it at the head of the kid with the toy rifle. Photographers played tricks in those days too.
I rarely paid more than $10 for a paperback prior to purchasing the kindle. Discount retailers like sams/walmart often have them for 5-6 bucks. As much as I love the kindle for travel, I will not pay $15 for a normal* ebook. I’ll just buy the cheaper paperback, which will cost the publisher more money. I’ll save the kindle books for travel only, purchasing the less expensive ones
*normal meaning entertainment. For history or other books my willingness to pay is in line with my perceived value.
Mourn not this loss.
Kennedy … down
Murtha … down
…hmmm, time to start a dead pool?
Byrd anyone?
Lot’s o info here:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2009-01-05-new-congress_N.htm
Bill, please correct my speling of Kenedy above.
thanx
Done - WTQ
Religion of horror strikes again. I cannot for the life of me imagine how someone buries his own daughter-alive- just because she has some male friends.
Newest health hazard: third hand smoke.
Related: my bullshit detector just pegged, and the needle wrapped around the stop.
C’mon PG. Don’t you know you can get cancer just from looking at a picture of someone smoking, or hearing about it, or even from seeing the word n**otine?
You have a point about the health effects of pictures. Every time I see Pelosi, I think that I’m having an aneurysm.
Newest health hazard: third hand smoke.
No surprise there…
Oxymoron or just plain morons.
There is probably a global warming connection here that the Berkeley scientists overlooked. The well-established relationship between hundreds of millions of smokers and AGW (pop) (crack) space aliens are stealing our nitrogen while we sleep it’s too late to stop them we will all die from shortages of fertilizer zzzzzzzzzzzzzz